Head vessel substitution:

Background Summary: What Happened at Davis-Besse

In March 2002 plant workers discovered a cavity in the head or top of the reactor vessel while they were
repairing control rod tubes which pass through the head. The tubes, which pass through the reactor vessel
head, are called control rod drive mechanism nozzles. Cracks were detected in 5 of the 69 nozzles.
In three of those nozzles, the cracks were all the way through the nozzle, allowing leakage of reactor cooling water, which contains boric acid.
Corrosion, caused by the boric acid, damaged the vessel head next to Nozzle No. 3, creating an irregular cavity about 4 inches by 5 inches and approximately 6 inches deep. The cavity penetrated the carbon steel portion of the vessel head, leaving only the stainless steel lining. The liner thickness varies somewhat with a minimum design thickness of 1/8 inch. Subsequent examination by Framatome, FirstEnergy’s contractor, found evidence of a series of cracks in the liner, none of which was entirely through the liner wall. After circumferential cracks - around the nozzle wall - were found in the control rod drive nozzles at Unit 3 of the Oconee Nuclear Power Station in 2001, the NRC required all pressurized water reactor (PWR) operators to report to the NRC on structural integrity of the nozzles and their plans to inspect the nozzles.
Plants with similar operating history to Oconee unit 3, including Davis-Besse, were to inspect their reactor vessel head penetrations by December 31, 2001, or to provide a basis for concluding that there were no cracked and leaking nozzles.

MP98 control rods system could be installed with advantages and benefits on existing PWR when head vessel substitution has to be done.
Corrozion, due to boric acid, is a big problem for this highly important component of the reactor. Extremly problematic situation could result of this, for example at Davis-Besse power plant.

FOR PWR
With conduits located inside the upper internals, MP98 liquid control system suppress head vessel penetration damages. The best solution to solve a problem is to suppress the device affected by the problem. In case of head vessel substitution with a standard head vessel, the problem is just delayed for few years; and corrozion due to boron is still active.
With MP98 solution, All penetrations are suppress in reactor vessel and in head vessel. The head vessel is cheapper and saffer. Boron is suppressed and in the same time you saves many years of corrozion for steam generators and primary circuit. Wastes are minimized (24% less for long activity waste with spectral shift fuel) (100% of tritium supressed). Contamination is also lower.
FOR BWR
Penetrations are at the vessel bottom and problem are not suppressed for that.

MP98 liquid control system: the best solution